Reported officers (all unpaid)
No paid executives reported in 2024. William & Evelyn Stokes Foundation CO James E Wehrly reported 1 unpaid officer or board member on its 990-PF.
Grants paid
Itemized grants reported on this foundation's 2024 Form 990-PF, Part XV.
Total granted
$250k
Itemized grants
1
Median grant
$250k
This is a private foundation. Peers are foundations of similar asset size ($1M - $10M), because foundation pay scales with assets under management, not revenue.
What Education executives earn in California
William & Evelyn Stokes Foundation CO James E Wehrly reported no executive compensation in its latest filing. For context, the highest-paid executive at a comparable education organization in California earns a median of $121,894.
These are education sector-wide figures, not this organization's reported pay. Based on 3,048 organizations across 3,048 filings (2019 – 2024).
See full Education pay data for California →Common questions about William & Evelyn Stokes Foundation CO James E Wehrly
What are William & Evelyn Stokes Foundation CO James E Wehrly's revenue and expenses?
In 2024, William & Evelyn Stokes Foundation CO James E Wehrly reported $25k in total revenue and $274k in total expenses on its IRS Form 990.
Compare any role, sector, or revenue band
Build your own benchmark from millions of reported positions.
This is a private foundation. Peers are foundations of similar asset size ($1M - $10M), because foundation pay scales with assets under management, not revenue.
Learn More About Nonprofit Compensation
Guides to help you understand and use this data
How to Look Up Nonprofit Salaries
Two approaches to finding executive compensation at any tax-exempt organization, from raw IRS filings to searchable databases.
Read moreAre Nonprofit Salaries Public?
What IRS Form 990 discloses about executive compensation, who has to report it, and how to look it up.
Read moreHow to Benchmark Nonprofit Executive Compensation
A step-by-step approach to using IRS Form 990 data for compensation benchmarking and peer comparison.
Read more