Reported officers (all unpaid)
No paid executives reported in 2024. BULLDOG ATHLETIC GROUP reported 3 unpaid officers and board members on its 990-PF.
Grants paid
Itemized grants reported on this foundation's 2024 Form 990-PF, Part XV.
Total granted
$49k
Itemized grants
14
Median grant
$3k
Revenue and expenses over time
BULLDOG ATHLETIC GROUP reported revenue and expenses across 2 filing years.
This is a private foundation. Peers are foundations of similar asset size (Under $1M), because foundation pay scales with assets under management, not revenue.
What Recreation & Sports executives earn in South Carolina
BULLDOG ATHLETIC GROUP reported no executive compensation in its latest filing. For context, the highest-paid executive at a comparable recreation & sports organization in South Carolina earns a median of $51,722.
These are recreation & sports sector-wide figures, not this organization's reported pay. Based on 86 organizations across 86 filings (2021 – 2024).
See full Recreation & Sports pay data for South Carolina →Common questions about BULLDOG ATHLETIC GROUP
What are BULLDOG ATHLETIC GROUP's revenue and expenses?
In 2024, BULLDOG ATHLETIC GROUP reported $48k in total revenue and $49k in total expenses on its IRS Form 990.
Compare any role, sector, or revenue band
Build your own benchmark from millions of reported positions.
This is a private foundation. Peers are foundations of similar asset size (Under $1M), because foundation pay scales with assets under management, not revenue.
Learn More About Nonprofit Compensation
Guides to help you understand and use this data
How to Look Up Nonprofit Salaries
Two approaches to finding executive compensation at any tax-exempt organization, from raw IRS filings to searchable databases.
Read moreAre Nonprofit Salaries Public?
What IRS Form 990 discloses about executive compensation, who has to report it, and how to look it up.
Read moreHow to Benchmark Nonprofit Executive Compensation
A step-by-step approach to using IRS Form 990 data for compensation benchmarking and peer comparison.
Read more