Executive compensation
Form 990-PF · Part VIII · 3 reported individuals · Filing year 2023
Percentile bands compare each position's total pay with the same role at Philanthropy, Voluntarism & Grantmaking organizations in California.
| Position | Total |
|---|---|
Trustee Board Member Median to 75th percentile | $65k $71k |
Trustee Board Member 25th percentile to median | $25k $27k |
Trustee Board Member 25th percentile to median | $25k $27k |
Teal figures restate each filed amount in 2026 dollars.
Estimated with San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA metro-area CPI-U, restating filed pay into April 2026 dollars. A restatement of past pay, not current or projected pay.
Browse compensation in Philanthropy, Voluntarism & Grantmaking →
Top pay as a share of expenses
In 2023, the highest total compensation at JUSTIN JACOBS JR CHARITABLE TRUST equaled 9% of the organization's total expenses. The median for philanthropy, voluntarism & grantmaking organizations is 15%.
Based on 35,946 philanthropy, voluntarism & grantmaking organizations, each measured at its most recent filing year with reported expenses and compensation.
Grants paid
Itemized grants reported on this foundation's 2023 Form 990-PF, Part XV.
Total granted
$170k
Itemized grants
2
Median grant
$85k
| Recipient | Location | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOTE AMERICA INC | SAN MATEO, CA | VOTING RIGHTS | $100k |
| SPUR | SAN FRANCISCO, CA | CREATE AN EQUITABLE COMMUNITY | $70k |
Up 30%
from 2022
From $50k in 2022 to $65k in 2023.
Estimated with San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA metro-area CPI-U, restating filed pay into April 2026 dollars. A restatement of past pay, not current or projected pay.
Board Member pay rose 30% from 2022 to 2023, while revenue rose 683%.
Pay for the position itself, not any one person. The officeholder may have changed between 2022 and 2023.
This is a private foundation. Peers are foundations of similar asset size ($10M - $25M), because foundation pay scales with assets under management, not revenue.
Among peers
Revenue and top compensation, plotted against similar organizations. This organization is highlighted in cyan.
Common questions about JUSTIN JACOBS JR CHARITABLE TRUST
What does the Board Member of JUSTIN JACOBS JR CHARITABLE TRUST earn?
In 2023, the Board Member of JUSTIN JACOBS JR CHARITABLE TRUST received $65,000 in total compensation. This pay is above the median (the midpoint) for Board Member roles among Philanthropy, Voluntarism & Grantmaking organizations in California, within the top half of comparable filings. Based on IRS Form 990 data.
How does Board Member pay at JUSTIN JACOBS JR CHARITABLE TRUST compare with similar nonprofits?
Compared with the same role at Philanthropy, Voluntarism & Grantmaking organizations in California, the 2023 pay of the Board Member at JUSTIN JACOBS JR CHARITABLE TRUST falls between the median and the 75th percentile. In 2023, the highest total compensation at JUSTIN JACOBS JR CHARITABLE TRUST equaled 9% of the organization's total expenses. The median for philanthropy, voluntarism & grantmaking organizations is 15%.
What are JUSTIN JACOBS JR CHARITABLE TRUST's revenue and expenses?
In 2023, JUSTIN JACOBS JR CHARITABLE TRUST reported $1.3M in total revenue and $692k in total expenses on its IRS Form 990.
Compare any role, sector, or revenue band
Build your own benchmark from millions of reported positions.
This is a private foundation. Peers are foundations of similar asset size ($10M - $25M), because foundation pay scales with assets under management, not revenue.
Learn More About Nonprofit Compensation
Guides to help you understand and use this data
How to Look Up Nonprofit Salaries
Two approaches to finding executive compensation at any tax-exempt organization, from raw IRS filings to searchable databases.
Read moreAre Nonprofit Salaries Public?
What IRS Form 990 discloses about executive compensation, who has to report it, and how to look it up.
Read moreHow to Benchmark Nonprofit Executive Compensation
A step-by-step approach to using IRS Form 990 data for compensation benchmarking and peer comparison.
Read more