Reported officers (all unpaid)
No paid executives reported in 2024. KATARA HULL MINISTRIES reported 4 unpaid officers and board members on its 990-EZ.
Top pay as a share of expenses
In 2022, the highest total compensation at KATARA HULL MINISTRIES equaled 42% of the organization's total expenses. The median for human services organizations is 8%.
Based on 26,698 human services organizations, each measured at its most recent filing year with reported expenses and compensation.
Revenue and expenses over time
KATARA HULL MINISTRIES reported revenue and expenses across 3 filing years.
What Human Services executives earn in Indiana
KATARA HULL MINISTRIES reported no executive compensation in its latest filing. For context, the highest-paid executive at a comparable human services organization in Indiana earns a median of $68,597.
These are human services sector-wide figures, not this organization's reported pay. Based on 628 organizations across 628 filings (2022 – 2024).
See full Human Services pay data for Indiana →Similar Organizations
New Haven, IN
South Bend, IN
Indianapolis, IN
Greenfield, IN
Fort Wayne, IN
South Bend, IN
Logansport, IN
Grabill, IN
Indianapolis, IN
Whiteland, IN
Common questions about KATARA HULL MINISTRIES
What are KATARA HULL MINISTRIES's revenue and expenses?
In 2024, KATARA HULL MINISTRIES reported $141k in total revenue and $141k in total expenses on its IRS Form 990.
Compare any role, sector, or revenue band
Build your own benchmark from millions of reported positions.
Learn More About Nonprofit Compensation
Guides to help you understand and use this data
How to Look Up Nonprofit Salaries
Two approaches to finding executive compensation at any tax-exempt organization, from raw IRS filings to searchable databases.
Read moreAre Nonprofit Salaries Public?
What IRS Form 990 discloses about executive compensation, who has to report it, and how to look it up.
Read moreHow to Benchmark Nonprofit Executive Compensation
A step-by-step approach to using IRS Form 990 data for compensation benchmarking and peer comparison.
Read more