THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE WAS ESTABLISHED TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, FOUNDATIONS AND OTHER POTENTIAL DONORS OPPORTUNITIES TO FURTHER THE MISSION OF THE LAFAYETTE FAMILY YMCA THROUGH CONTRIBUTIONS.
Reported officers (all unpaid)
No paid executives reported in 2023. YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE reported 8 unpaid officers and board members on its 990.
Revenue and expenses over time
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE reported revenue and expenses across 2 filing years.
What Human Services executives earn in Indiana
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE reported no executive compensation in its latest filing. For context, the highest-paid executive at a comparable human services organization in Indiana earns a median of $68,597.
These are human services sector-wide figures, not this organization's reported pay. Based on 628 organizations across 628 filings (2022 – 2024).
See full Human Services pay data for Indiana →Common questions about YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE
What are YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE's revenue and expenses?
In 2023, YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE reported $36k in total revenue and $83k in total expenses on its IRS Form 990.
Compare any role, sector, or revenue band
Build your own benchmark from millions of reported positions.
Learn More About Nonprofit Compensation
Guides to help you understand and use this data
How to Look Up Nonprofit Salaries
Two approaches to finding executive compensation at any tax-exempt organization, from raw IRS filings to searchable databases.
Read moreAre Nonprofit Salaries Public?
What IRS Form 990 discloses about executive compensation, who has to report it, and how to look it up.
Read moreHow to Benchmark Nonprofit Executive Compensation
A step-by-step approach to using IRS Form 990 data for compensation benchmarking and peer comparison.
Read more