Reported officers (all unpaid)
No paid executives reported in 2023. EDWARD CRAIG SMITH SCHOLARSHIP FOUN reported 3 unpaid officers and board members on its 990-PF.
Grants paid
Itemized grants reported on this foundation's 2023 Form 990-PF, Part XV.
Total granted
$0
Itemized grants
0
This is a private foundation. Peers are foundations of similar asset size (Under $1M), because foundation pay scales with assets under management, not revenue.
What Philanthropy, Voluntarism & Grantmaking executives earn in Arkansas
EDWARD CRAIG SMITH SCHOLARSHIP FOUN reported no executive compensation in its latest filing. For context, the highest-paid executive at a comparable philanthropy, voluntarism & grantmaking organization in Arkansas earns a median of $23,614.
These are philanthropy, voluntarism & grantmaking sector-wide figures, not this organization's reported pay. Based on 120 organizations across 120 filings (2023 – 2024).
See full Philanthropy, Voluntarism & Grantmaking pay data for Arkansas →Common questions about EDWARD CRAIG SMITH SCHOLARSHIP FOUN
What are EDWARD CRAIG SMITH SCHOLARSHIP FOUN's revenue and expenses?
In 2023, EDWARD CRAIG SMITH SCHOLARSHIP FOUN reported $3k in total revenue and $8k in total expenses on its IRS Form 990.
Compare any role, sector, or revenue band
Build your own benchmark from millions of reported positions.
This is a private foundation. Peers are foundations of similar asset size (Under $1M), because foundation pay scales with assets under management, not revenue.
Learn More About Nonprofit Compensation
Guides to help you understand and use this data
How to Look Up Nonprofit Salaries
Two approaches to finding executive compensation at any tax-exempt organization, from raw IRS filings to searchable databases.
Read moreAre Nonprofit Salaries Public?
What IRS Form 990 discloses about executive compensation, who has to report it, and how to look it up.
Read moreHow to Benchmark Nonprofit Executive Compensation
A step-by-step approach to using IRS Form 990 data for compensation benchmarking and peer comparison.
Read more