Reported officers (all unpaid)
No paid executives reported in 2023. Jesus Connecting the Dots reported 3 unpaid officers and board members on its 990-PF.
Grants paid
Itemized grants reported on this foundation's 2023 Form 990-PF, Part XV.
Total granted
$0
Itemized grants
0
Funded by
Private foundations whose Form 990-PF Part XV grants matched this organization.
This is a private foundation. Peers are foundations of similar asset size (Under $1M), because foundation pay scales with assets under management, not revenue.
What Food, Agriculture & Nutrition executives earn in Missouri
Jesus Connecting the Dots reported no executive compensation in its latest filing. For context, the highest-paid executive at a comparable food, agriculture & nutrition organization in Missouri earns a median of $65,078.
These are food, agriculture & nutrition sector-wide figures, not this organization's reported pay. Based on 52 organizations across 52 filings (2023 – 2024).
See full Food, Agriculture & Nutrition pay data for Missouri →Common questions about Jesus Connecting the Dots
What are Jesus Connecting the Dots's revenue and expenses?
In 2023, Jesus Connecting the Dots reported $79k in total revenue and $492 in total expenses on its IRS Form 990.
Compare any role, sector, or revenue band
Build your own benchmark from millions of reported positions.
This is a private foundation. Peers are foundations of similar asset size (Under $1M), because foundation pay scales with assets under management, not revenue.
Learn More About Nonprofit Compensation
Guides to help you understand and use this data
How to Look Up Nonprofit Salaries
Two approaches to finding executive compensation at any tax-exempt organization, from raw IRS filings to searchable databases.
Read moreAre Nonprofit Salaries Public?
What IRS Form 990 discloses about executive compensation, who has to report it, and how to look it up.
Read moreHow to Benchmark Nonprofit Executive Compensation
A step-by-step approach to using IRS Form 990 data for compensation benchmarking and peer comparison.
Read more