READING POWER, INC IS A NOT FOR PROFIT LITERACY TUTORING PROGRAM SERVING LOW-ACHIEVING CHILDREN ATTENDING ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS. THEIR MISSION IS TO ACCELERATE CHILDREN'S LITERACY LEARNING AND TO DEVELOP IN THEM A LOVE OF READING AND WRITING. THIS GOAL IS ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH AN INDEPENDENT TUTORING PROGRAM WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE SCHOOLS. THE BELIEF IS THAT ALL CHILDREN DESERVE TO REACH THEIR ACADEMIC POTENTIAL.
Reported officers (all unpaid)
No paid executives reported in 2023. READING POWER INC reported 21 unpaid officers and board members on its 990.
Funded by
Private foundations whose Form 990-PF Part XV grants matched this organization.
Revenue and expenses over time
READING POWER INC reported revenue and expenses across 2 filing years.
What Youth Development executives earn in Illinois
READING POWER INC reported no executive compensation in its latest filing. For context, the highest-paid executive at a comparable youth development organization in Illinois earns a median of $64,211.
These are youth development sector-wide figures, not this organization's reported pay. Based on 199 organizations across 199 filings (2021 – 2024).
See full Youth Development pay data for Illinois →Common questions about READING POWER INC
What are READING POWER INC's revenue and expenses?
In 2023, READING POWER INC reported $1.9M in total revenue and $1.6M in total expenses on its IRS Form 990.
Compare any role, sector, or revenue band
Build your own benchmark from millions of reported positions.
Learn More About Nonprofit Compensation
Guides to help you understand and use this data
How to Look Up Nonprofit Salaries
Two approaches to finding executive compensation at any tax-exempt organization, from raw IRS filings to searchable databases.
Read moreAre Nonprofit Salaries Public?
What IRS Form 990 discloses about executive compensation, who has to report it, and how to look it up.
Read moreHow to Benchmark Nonprofit Executive Compensation
A step-by-step approach to using IRS Form 990 data for compensation benchmarking and peer comparison.
Read more