Skip to main content

CENTER FOR WORKFORCE INCLUSION INC

EIN: 52-6048236Silver Spring, MDZIP: 209106391
P810 - Human Services501(c)(3)

Mission

CENTER FOR WORKFORCE INCLUSION, INC. (CWI), WAS INCORPORATED IN 1962, AS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION. CWI'S PRIMARY MISSION IS TO CONNECT EXPERIENCED AMERICANS, ESPECIALLY LOW INCOME AND DISADVANTAGED ADULTS, WITH EMPLOYERS IN ALL 50 STATES TO ENSURE A VIBRANT, DIVERSE, AND PRODUCTIVE WORKFORCE. IN THIS REGARD, CWI INVOLVES ITSELF IN ACTIVITIES TO DETERMINE HOW EXPERIENCED WORKERS MAY BE ASSISTED, PRIMARILY THROUGH EMPLOYMENT, TOWARD A POSITIVE ROLE OF WORTHWHILE AND VALUED CONTRIBUTION TO SOCIETY. CWI'S PRIMARY SOURCE OF FUNDING IS THROUGH AGREEMENTS WITH VARIOUS U.S. GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS OR AGENCIES. THE CONTINUED FUNDING OF THESE AGREEMENTS IS DEPENDENT ON NATIONAL AND LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PRINCIPAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED BY CWI.

Financials

YearRevenueExpensesAssets
2022$58.3M$0$24.8M

Compensation

GARY OFFICER
$239,618
$0
$0
$286,297
SAMUEL GAILLARD
$199,386
$0
$0
$255,191
CHRISTINE R GARLAND
$157,436
$0
$0
$210,679
MELISSA FLYNN
$147,315
$0
$0
$167,128
ROSEMARY SCHMIDT
$136,219
$0
$0
$160,393
MITCHELL MILNER
$0
$0
$0
$0
BERT HASH JR
$0
$0
$0
$0
ANGELA BEDDOE
$0
$0
$0
$0
CLINT ODOM
$0
$0
$0
$0
CHARLOTTE MATHER TAYLOR
$0
$0
$0
$0
ANNE MADISON
$0
$0
$0
$0
ANGELA CICCOLO
$0
$0
$0
$0
GREG ROBERTS
$0
$0
$0
$0
RAMSEY HARRIS
$0
$0
$0
$0
WILLIAM GOOD
$0
$0
$0
$0
GAIL LAVIELLE
$0
$0
$0
$0
ELIZABETH ALLEN BAILEY
$0
$0
$0
$0
JANE OATES
$0
$0
$0
$0
DAVID GAMSE
$0
$0
$0
$0

Similar Organizations

$53M revenue
Similar sector (P)Very similar revenue ($53M vs $58.3M)Same state (Maryland)Similar median compensation ($185k vs $189k)Similar size (23 vs 23 executives)
$52.8M revenue
Similar sector (P)Very similar revenue ($52.8M vs $58.3M)Same state (Maryland)Similar median compensation ($161k vs $189k)
BELLO MACHRE INC

Glen Burnie, MD

$44.2M revenue
Similar sector (P)Similar revenue ($44.2M vs $58.3M)Same state (Maryland)Similar median compensation ($198k vs $189k)Similar size (21 vs 23 executives)
$59.6M revenue
Similar sector (P)Very similar revenue ($59.6M vs $58.3M)Same state (Maryland)Similar size (23 vs 23 executives)
$44M revenue
Similar sector (P)Similar revenue ($44M vs $58.3M)Same state (Maryland)Similar median compensation ($206k vs $189k)
$45.3M revenue
Similar sector (P)Similar revenue ($45.3M vs $58.3M)Same state (Maryland)Similar median compensation ($164k vs $189k)
$32.6M revenue
Similar sector (P)Comparable revenue ($32.6M vs $58.3M)Same state (Maryland)Similar median compensation ($166k vs $189k)Similar size (24 vs 23 executives)
$37.7M revenue
Similar sector (P)Comparable revenue ($37.7M vs $58.3M)Same state (Maryland)Similar median compensation ($217k vs $189k)Similar size (24 vs 23 executives)
$71.5M revenue
Similar sector (P)Similar revenue ($71.5M vs $58.3M)Same state (Maryland)Similar size (22 vs 23 executives)
$44.9M revenue
Similar sector (P)Similar revenue ($44.9M vs $58.3M)Same state (Maryland)Comparable compensation levels
Data from IRS Form 990 filings (2022).